
According to Mark McMinn’s essay A Psychology of Sin and a Sin of Psychology, personal sin is sin that is committed of our own volition and agency, and original sin is the general brokenness that affects human nature and the world. Because of original sin, the world is less than it was created to be. As I read this essay for class, I was reminded of two mistaken assumptions about sin that I habitually make.
First, when it comes to disorder or tragedy, I have a tendency to play the blame game: X happened because of Y’s sin or disobedience. But evidence from the Bible suggests that original sin wreaks havoc on the order of the world, which inevitably affects our daily lives in more or less conspicuous ways. In the story of Jesus’ healing of the man born blind, the disciples are eager to play the blame game. They want to know the cause for the man’s physical disability. If they can attribute the brokenness of the man’s vision to his or his parents’ sin, then they can discriminate against the man while feeling smug about their own apparent righteousness. However, Jesus responds by focusing not on the sin, but on the powerful work of God in the life of the blind man.
Next, my typical response to tragedy or disorder is to assert that God ultimately uses all things—including tsunamis, earthquakes, mental illnesses, cancers, and deaths—for his glory. I sincerely believe that God can and does use tragedy to work out His redemption story. However, when I quickly quote Romans 8:28* as a refutation of the true badness of the problems of the world, I am attempting, in vain, to ignore the pain and suffering that obviously exists. My words become hollow, and I empty the verse of its meaning.
So what is a better response to the sin and brokenness of this world? How does our understanding of original sin and personal sin change the way we approach mental illness? How do we balance the seemingly contradictory ideas that (1) God uses tragedy for good, and (2) God grieves brokenness and sin to an extent that we are not even capable of understanding?
As a Christian, the first thing I can do is hope. If God can use deicide to facilitate the salvation of humankind, then surely he can use illness, disasters, and our tears in his redemption story. Second, as a Christian who is aware of God’s original intentions for this world, I need to act. Instead of pointing fingers or theorizing abstractly, I need to alleviate suffering, restore goodness, and heal communities through the gifts and relationships God has granted me.
I once heard a pastor explain how the cross saves us from sin in our past, present, and future. In the past the cross saved us from the penalty of our sins, in the present we are being saved from the power of sin, and one day we will be saved from the very presence of sin. This understanding of sin and salvation gives me bold humility in my work as a clinician. I am humbled because it is not my knowledge, but God’s wisdom, that leads to true healing. However, I am bold because I know that there will be a day when all is made right with the world. I look forward to the day when I will behold the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world.**
*And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. (ESV)
Tags: hope, Mark McMinn, psychopathology, sin